You’ve never really been the best student, or the best at anything for that matter; other than drifting like a leaf in the wind. It’s not like you haven’t tried, it’s just that things never seem to work out for you, so you’ve decided it’s best not to try at all, as the result of your actions seems to always be the same old pattern no matter what you try. But it isn’t your fault, it couldn’t be considering the hand you were dealt. A diagnosis of Obsessive - Compulsive disorder and an innate need to impress people coupled with clinical depression and social anxiety keeps you unable to strive for what you want, and not being satisfied with what you have. Not to mention your childhood which should be a whole new disorder all together; who knew two people with chronic personality disorders paired with years of opium abuse didn’t mix? Regardless you just keep trudging through life, never looking forward but not letting yourself be stuck in the past either, forever drifting along your own stream of consciousness.
Anyways, back to the matter of school. It’s 7am now and you have exams at 9am and 1:10pm respectively, both of which make up a large portion of your semester grade, and neither of which you have prepared for in the slightest. You were always told that school is the most important years of your life and that how hard you try in school will determine your path in life. But what about personal development? You’ve not even been alive for two decades yet and you already see the deconstruction of students under the pressures of school; everyone enters with their own personality and dreams, yet they all leave the same shapeless mass with “plans” where their dreams once stood. Nevertheless, you feel an ever growing sting in the back of your throat, not necessarily about the exams but about your choices in general. What if by fighting the typical structure of society you’re alienating yourself before you even had the chance to succeed? Either way none of that matters now, you’re legs are already carrying you out the door and down the stairs, to your first exam.
AP Language and Composition
Thursday, April 14, 2016
Tuesday, January 19, 2016
Mr. Elliot or Mr. Smelliot?? Sorry it's late...
Jane Austen’s Persuasion
depicts the everyday happenings of a wealthy elite family who inhabit England
during the early nineteenth century, a society which is severely segmented in
accordance to wealth and social stature rather than personal merit or
character. The most glaring example of such segregation based of social status
can be seen through comparing the perspectives of characters within the novel,
as well as how they are perceived by their peers. Mr. Elliot, for example,
becomes renowned for both his social status and his ability to charm anyone who
crosses his path; however as the story progresses his true character proves to
be in stark contrast to his facade. Mr. Elliot is representative of society’s
ideal and his perspective on social relations exemplifies the split between
social classes, stating that “good company requires only birth, education, and
manners, and with regard to education is not very nice” (Austen 98). Mr. Elliot
is an advocate of dismissing the merits of education and personal achievement in
favor of associating with those within the same social standing. Conversely,
Anne argues that “my idea of good company, Mr. Elliot, is the company of
clever, well-informed people, who have a great deal of conversation; that is
what I call good company” (Austen 98). Unlike most of her family as well as her
mentor Lady Russell, Anne does not share the sentiment that the division of
social classes is a necessity, but rather chooses to converse with those whose
company she enjoys such as Mrs. Clay and Mrs. Smith. Prejudice against those of
lower social stature is a theme throughout the book, as even Lady Russell who
is stated as being of genuine character misjudges the intentions of Mr. Elliot
and Mrs. Clay, claiming that the “satisfaction in Mr. Elliot outweighed all the
plague of Mrs. Clay” (Austen 96). Lady Russell is quick to invalidate Anne’s
friendship with Mrs. Clay while promoting relations with Mr. Elliot based on
social status alone, disregarding Mrs. Clay’s loyalty as a friend and Mr.
Elliot’s fiendish nature. Ultimately, Jane Austen’s depiction of English
society through Persuasion mirrors
the increasingly segmented hierarchy in Europe during the nineteenth century, and
satirizes this sentiment by contrasting high class with low character and vice
versa.
Works Cited
Austen,
Jane. Persuasion. Mineola: Dover Publications, 1997. Print.
Monday, January 11, 2016
In modern society, the general public has become accustom to hearing about tragedies and travesties alike through mediums such as television, radio, and ofcourse the Internet. However, no one ever suspects that such malice will ever penetrate their own secluded existence, despite the fact that in reality such incidents are a constant threat to a person's welbeing. Thus, when people are confronted with an incident which mirrors their own familiar lifestyles, such as that depicted in Joyce Oates' short story Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?, fear is instinctively distilled in the reader. This phenomena can best be explained through Walter Sullivan's observation that "horror resides in the transformation of what we know best, the intimate and comfortable details of our lives made suddenly threatening" (Wegs 99). Oates' tale depicts a young teenage girl named Connie who falls prey to a scheming older predator, who uses charisma and brovado to gain information about Connie, which he then uses to track her every move.
Connie is the American ideal of what a young teenage girl is supposedly expected to strive for in terms of social standing, and she comes to believe that “real value lies in beauty” (Wegs 101). This deviation from a healthy mantality and self image causes Connie to stray away from her morals which were poorly instilled in her by her mother who Connie wishes "was dead and she herself was dead and it was all over" (Oates 1). Once again Connie's less than stellar outlook on life can be derived from the neglect that she feels from her father who showed little in his daughter, instead he "didn’t bother talking to them much" (Oates 1). The misguidance and neglect that Connie experienced from those around her decided her fate, as she would come to believe in romantic fantasies rather than real life dangers, which would allow Arnold Friend to push his way in to her life.
The effectiveness of Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been? in chilling readers to the core can be attributed to how relatable the tale of Connie's demise is, and how applicable the situation is to modern society. It is not uncommon for teenagers to grow up without the guidance of their parents, even when the parents aren't physically absent, and as a result it is not a stretch to believe that a young girl could be manipulated in to giving her own life in exchange for her family's safety, as Connie comes to realize in the short story. Overall, Oates' tale brings to light the dangers of teenage suspectability to outside influence, and the importance of a strong guiding force in the lives of the youthful.
Works Cited
Oates, Joyce Carol. “Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?” New Brunswick:
Rutgers University Press, 2002. Print.
Wegs, Joyce M. “’Don’t You Know Who I Am?’: The Grotesque in Oate’s ‘Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?’” Journal of Narrative Technique 5, 1995. Print.
Wednesday, October 28, 2015
Present Shock
In his novel, Present Shock, Douglas Rushkoff
describes a society in which technology has advanced to such an accelerated
state the technology itself is evolving faster than humans are able to account
for. No longer are people concerned with what is happening in the present, but
rather are constantly concerned with the events of the future. Furthermore, technology,
such as the remote control, has enabled entertainment to reach a state of
constant climax; rather than spending time to build up a plot and rising action
that culminates in an apex. Rushkoff explains that the remote control has “more
than any postmodern idea or media educator, changed the way we related to
television, its commercials, and the story structure on which both depended”(Rushkoff
21). Since an audience can switch away from a channel with the click of a
button, television must offer the viewer a constant of stream of excitement or
else fail to draw in and maintain a sizable audience. Modern day television
shows, such as Rick and Morty, aim to keep the viewer wondering what will
happen next, and this is most commonly achieved by creating a sporadic and
unpredictable experience.
Rick and Morty depicts the misadventures of an
average highschool student and his grandfather, who just happens to be a
maniacal mad scientist who spends the majority of his time hoping around the
multiverse. The television show sets a precedent of unpredictability as Morty
is dragged through different universes and forced to endure a different apocalyptic
scenario every episode. In one particular episode, Rick accidentally mutates the
entirety of the human race in to a mismatched combination of different species.
The episode consists of nothing but chaos that could be considered climax after
climax, and in the final two minutes of the episode Rick and Morty simply
abandon their universe for an identical one. This sort of plot narrative is counter-intuitive to any that has been seen in the past centuries. Furthermore, the issue of
abandoning their own universe is never brought up in any further episodes, thus
drawing parallels between other modern television shows such as The Simpsons
and South Park. Rushkoff gives his perspective on this phenomena in saying that
“The Simpsons, along with the many satirical, self-referential shows that
followed its path (the creators of Family Guy, South Park, and even The Office
all credit The Simpsons as a seminal influence), offers the narrative-wary
viewer some of the satisfaction that traditional stories used to provide— but
through nonnarrative means (Rushkoff 26). Television shows such as Rick and
Morty, South Park, and the Simpsons give the audience the entertainment they
crave, but without having to sit through the exposition that would be found in
more traditional forms of entertainment. Furthermore, innovations such as
Netflix offer entertainment free of commercials, allowing the viewer even
greater access a constant stream of excitement.
In conclusion, the modern narrative arc of
television shows has evolved to accommodate society’s need for constant
entertainment, even if it undermines the structural integrity of the plot. In
Rick and Morty, the two adventurers spend twenty minutes creating chaos in various
universes, only to resolve their issue with a simple solution in the remaining
two minutes. Rather than following the traditional format of a plot triangle
(exposition, followed by rising action, falling action, and a resolution), shows
such as Rick and Morty or the Simpsons cut out the “unnecessary” rising and
falling actions; instead opting for a model that favors a constant state of
apex and excitement. Additionally, innovations such as the remote control and
companies such as Netflix allow viewers to cut out any further distractions
such as commercials and actual plot devices.
Works Cited
Rushkoff, Douglas. Present Shock: When Everything
Happens Now. New York: Penguin Group, 2013. Print.
Wednesday, October 14, 2015
The Line Between Delirium and Diligence
The Line Between Delirium and Diligence
In
the biographical novel A Moveable Feast,
the story of Ernest Hemingway’s life is recreated from a series of unorganized
diary entries and letters which have been pieced together in order to
illustrate the life of the up and coming writer in Paris during the early
twentieth century. The use of Hemingway’s own journal entries as a basis for
the novel allows for a first person perspective which is unique to most other
biographical pieces, welcoming readers in to the peculiar mind of what many
would consider to be a literary genius. However, due to the cluttered nature of
the journals, the plot of the story consequentially does not follow a linear
timeline but rather jumps around to highlights in Hemingway’s life, while at
the same time avoiding the tragedies that Hemingway himself would be too
haunted by to write in a journal. Hemingway alludes to the wrongdoings in his
life in his diaries yet fails to address them directly, as was the case when he
had an affair with Pauline Pfeiffer despite the love he retained for his wife.
Hemingway describes the winter prior to the affair as “a happy and innocent
winter in childhood compared to the next year, a nightmare winter disguised as
the greatest fun of all, and the murderous summer that was to follow”
(Hemingway 179). Hemingway illustrates perfectly the stereotype of the tortured
artist; driven to insanity by the frustrations and temptations set forth by his
art and by the people that surround him. Hemingway’s depression would deteriorate
his spirit and his body alike, making it difficult to face the reality of the
mistakes he had made and the people he had hurt along the way.
Through the journals and diary entries that were
compiled in to A Moveable Feast, Hemingway displays a writing style which at
times is highly literal and analytical, yet contrastingly uses a great deal of
imagery and figurative language also. While reminiscing about the Closerie des
Lilas, Hemingway notes that “the only poet I ever saw there was a Blaise
Cendrars, with his broken boxer’s face and his pinned-up empty sleeve, rolling
a cigarette with his one good hand” (Hemingway 69). Hemingway meticulously notes the fact that
Blaise Cendrars was rolling a cigarette whenever the two came in contact,
however Hemingway doesn not give an analytical characterization of the man; preferring
to instead plant the image of a broken boxer in to the mind of the reader. These
contrasting styles within Hemingway’s work give insight in to the writer’s
unique perspective on the world and what he deemed worthy of writing down.
Finally, this book was likely chosen to be a part of
the curriculum because not only is Hemingway a highly influential author, but
also has an impactful and original writing style. Unlike most biographies which
are told from an outsider’s perspective, A Moveable Feast is a reflection of
Hemingway’s sporadic, and at times deranged, psyche which allowed him to bleed
his emotions and thoughts on to the page. Furthermore, the use of time as a
nonlinear construct shows how time can be used to influence a story’s plot and
coherence, which all contribute to an author’s unique style.
Works Cited
Hemingway,
Ernest. A Moveable Feast. New York:
Scribner. 1964. Print.
Wednesday, September 30, 2015
End of Education
As private school students, many of us get caught up
in the horror stories that circulate about the public school system ranging
from outrageous claims about gang violence to the inexplicably high failure
rate. However, any student that has experienced both the public and private
school systems would happily say that many of these farce claims are no more
than rumors, for the most part. Although the stories of gang crime and drug
abuse don’t always hold true, the criticisms of the public school curriculum
does hold some truth. As Neil Postman points out in his novel End of Education,
the public school system of 1995 was centralized around a one sided perspective
that lacked cultural diversity and favored a Western worldview. The difference
between Postman’s description of the education system in 1995 and the current
public school system is that modern day America has accepted a multicultural
ideology.
In End of Education, Postman voices
his criticisms of the 1995 public school system which barred religious
teachings in school. Postman states that religion is a necessity for schooling
as, “so much of our painting, music, architecture, literature, and science are
intertwined with religion. It is, therefore, quite impossible (impossible by
definition) for anyone to claim to be educated who has no knowledge of the role
played by religion in the formation of culture” (Postman 150). Thus, Postman is
highly critical of the narrow minded education structure that in part
characterized the public education system of 1995, concluding that the
ignorance of religion’s roll in social conduct is a sign of an uneducated
individual. However, fast forward twenty-five years to 2015 and America has
seen a huge swing towards a multicultural and socially plural society which not
only acknowledges the role of religion in social conduct but also teaches
religion in schools from an analytical standpoint.
Furthermore,
Postman concludes that youth that are raised in a socially aware school system
will become well rounded people, by “understanding the principle of diversity,
is that by studying religion, our students can become acquainted with, first,
the variety of ways people have offered to explain themselves and, second, the
astonishing unity of their explanations” (Postman 150). By teaching students in an environment that
promotes and accepts a multicultural perspective, students learn to express
their thoughts and ideas in a more productive manner thus creating a more
efficient and progressive society. Overall, Postman’s hypothesis that ignorance
of religion is detrimental to the education system withstands the test of time,
and is exemplified by the success of a socially plural perspective in modern
day America.
Works Cited
Postman, Neil. The End of Education: Redefining the
Value of School. New York: Vintage, 1996.
Print.
Thursday, September 17, 2015
Paying the Ultimate Price: Survival of the Fittest in the Congo
Charles Darwin was both an esteemed scientist and one of
the leading philosophers of his time, applying his theory of evolution and
survival of the fittest to both the physical and social interactions between
people. Darwin upheld “that huge numbers were destined to succumb in the
struggle for existence. Those who survived to grow up-- and perpetuate the
race—would therefore be those who came out best in the struggle for survival”
(Gaarder 409). According to Darwin’s studies, those species with the greatest
capabilities to adapt to their physical environment would be the same species
that withstood the obstacles that would have otherwise obliterated their race.
Furthermore, Darwin extrapolated that the same principles of physical survival
could be applied to thriving within the society; people that could fit in to
the social customs of a society would be accepted while those who rejected the
customs would themselves be rejected.
In the case of the Price family in The Poisonwood Bible,
Darwin’s philosophy of survival of the fittest applies in both a physical and
social sense. Unlike the Kilanga villagers, the Price family were accustom to
the luxuries of the western world, therefore they were ill prepared for life in
the Congo where running water would have been a novelty. Additionally, the
Prices’ condition was worsened by Nathan’s stubbornness in upholding western
ideals and beliefs. In the physical world, Nathan refused to conform to the
villagers’ system of farming and as a result his garden could not sustain a
substantial number of crops. It was not until Nathan adapted his garden to fit
in with the Congo that his plants began to grow. Furthermore, the Price family
rejected the religious beliefs of the village and as a result they felt segregated
from the rest of the Congolese people. For example, Nathan’ death was due to
his disregard for the Congolese peoples’ beliefs as he attempted to forcibly
baptize a group of children in the river. In conclusion, Darwin’s philosophy of
survival of the fittest applies to the Poisonwood Bible in not only a physical
sense, but in a social sense also.
Works Cited
Gaarder,
Jostein. Sophie's World. New York: Berkley Books, 1991. Print.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)